AegisForge — The assessment is the record. Aegis reads it with you.

Evidence arrives, and becomes an organized result

The client drops what they have. Each file is screened and fingerprinted, matched to the open request it answers, and shown for review. The client changes any match, submits, and sees what is covered and what still needs attention. Aegis offers the next action.

AEGISFORGEHarbor Point Property Management

AssessmentASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001Evidence due 28 Nov

You are ClientEB

ZIP

harbor-point-evidence-nov.zip

38 files · 212 MB

Received

Dropped as	Proposed match
scan_0427.pdf	Personnel screening procedure v3.2 → PS.L2-3.9.1
IMG_2231.png	MFA policy, privileged accounts → IA.L2-3.5.3
export (3).xlsx	Local administrators, PMC-APP-01 → AC.L2-3.1.1
diagram-final-v2.pdf	Boundary diagram r2 → SC.L2-3.13.1
… 33 more · 37 proposed · 1 file held for a marking

Open requests · 11

Submit 37 matchesElena Brooks · changed 2 · held 1

REQ-…-019	Personnel screening procedure	OpenEvidence attached
REQ-…-018	MFA policy	OpenEvidence attached
REQ-…-021	Admin group membership	OpenEvidence attached
REQ-…-017	Boundary diagram	OpenSuperseded · r1 still cited
REQ-…-020	Access control policy	Open · nothing matched

Covered 9 of 112 need attention

Aegis advisory

Two requests still need something. REQ-020 has no matching file in the drop. REQ-017 cites boundary diagram r1, and you uploaded r2. You also mentioned a new file share: I can start the scoping interview for it.

Open REQ-020Replace with r2Start scoping

Staged example · synthetic data

A client drops a ZIP into AegisForge.

Drop what you haveA ZIP, a folder, or files chosen together. Supported formats are screened and fingerprinted on arrival.
Matched, for your reviewEach file gets a proposed name and a proposed match to an open request. One file with a marking is held, not entered.
Reviewed and submittedChange any match, then submit. The requests fill in as the evidence that answers them is attached.
Covered, or needs attentionThe client sees the state of the whole request list, not an inbox.
The next action, offeredAegis explains the two gaps and offers to start scoping.

Evidence becomes a human decision

The assessor opens an objective and the relevant artifact opens beside it. Aegis identifies the passage that supports it, or contradicts it, and suggests a rating with a rationale. The assessor edits, confirms, and the saved result carries its source trail.

Open the objectivePS.L2-3.9.1[a], not yet rated.
The artifact opens beside itEVD-NWA-0006, page 4, already filed to this control.
Aegis finds the passageSupporting text highlighted in the file; anything contradicting is flagged the same way.
A suggestion, not a ratingMet, with the methods it supports and a draft rationale. Nothing is saved.
The assessor edits and confirmsAdds the interview, presses Save. The server requires result, method, rationale and artifact.
On the record, with its sourcesRated by a named person at a time, pointing to the file, the page and the hash.

AEGISFORGENorthwind Assurance

AssessmentASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001Assessors test controls

You are AssessorDW

PS.L2-3.9.1[a] · Personnel security

Individuals are screened prior to authorizing access to organizational systems containing CUI

Not ratedMetMethods: examine · interview · test

Personnel Screening Procedure, v3.2EVD-NWA-0006 · p. 4

4.1 Human Resources maintains the screening standard in Appendix A and reviews it annually.

4.2 Prior to authorizing access to any organizational system, Human Resources completes the background screening defined in Appendix A and records the result in the personnel file. Access is not provisioned until the screening result is recorded. Rescreening occurs every five years or on change of role.

Page 4 of 9

Aegis advisory

Reading EVD-NWA-0006, 9 pages

Supports p. 4 §4.2

“Access is not provisioned until the screening result is recorded.”

Contradicts · none found

SuggestedMetMethodsExamine, InterviewRationaleProcedure §4.2 requires screening before provisioning. Confirmed with the HR lead in interview, 6 Nov.

ConfirmEditSave rating

MetRated by Dana Whitfield · 6 Nov 16:04:12 · examine, interviewEVD-NWA-0006 · p. 4 · sha256 9f3a…c21e · r4

Staged example · synthetic data

The assessor opens PS.L2-3.9.1[a].

One assessment, four roles, every handoff on the record

The same assessment, ASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001, moves from the client to the assessor, to the independent reviewer, to the approver. Each handoff is a visible event. Each decision is a person's. Choose a role to watch its part.

Client

Establishes scope, uploads evidence and works through outstanding requests with assistance. Answers the CUI question for each file.

Handoff: 37 files sent to Northwind Assurance, each bound to revision 4 with its hash.

Assessor

Examines the evidence, works through the controls, records ratings and rationale, and packages the work. Aegis reads and suggests; the assessor rates.

Handoff: revision 3 frozen and hashed, submitted for independent review.

Reviewer

Performs quality control: checks the evidence and the conclusions against the assessment plan, samples, and can return issues for correction. Never on the team.

Handoff: concurred with one note resolved, sent to the approver.

Approver

Approves the package for release. In a CMMC Level 2 assessment that is the firm's approver confirming the score, the status the results support and which Not Met items may carry a plan; in an RMF or FedRAMP workflow the same seat is the authorizing official. Reads the exact revision, down to the file behind any page.

Approved: score 104 of 110, Conditional Level 2 recommended, six 1-point items on a POA&M to close within 180 days. The MFA finding could not be deferred, so it was fixed and re-examined before the freeze. Released to the client.

AEGISFORGEHarbor Point Property Management

AssessmentASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001Evidence

You are ClientEB

Needs you · 2 of 11

Evidence & documents

✓Scope v1 confirmed · 14 items · bound to this assessment

✓37 files named, filed, CUI question answered · 1 held for a marking

✓9 of 11 requests covered · 2 answered this morning

Request	Control	Status
REQ-…-019 · Personnel screening procedure	PS.L2-3.9.1	Evidence attached
REQ-…-018 · MFA policy	IA.L2-3.5.3	Evidence attached
REQ-…-021 · Admin group membership	AC.L2-3.1.1	Evidence attached
REQ-…-017 · Boundary diagram	SC.L2-3.13.1	Replaced with r2
REQ-…-020 · Access control policy	AC.L2-3.1.1	Answered this morning

HandoffSent to Northwind Assurance · 6 Nov 10:42 · 37 files · bound to r4 · hashed

Elena Brooks pressed Send. From here the assessor sees the files; the client sees the assessment move in real time.

Staged example · synthetic data

AEGISFORGENorthwind Assurance

AssessmentASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001Assessors test controls

You are AssessorDW

Arrived37 files from Harbor Point · 6 Nov 10:42 · read by Aegis against 110 controls · 320 objectives

38 of 110 rated6 Not Metread 16:04

PS.L2-3.9.1[a]	Met	examine, interview · EVD-NWA-0006
PS.L2-3.9.1[b]	Not ratedMet	examine · EVD-NWA-0006
IA.L2-3.5.3[a]	Not ratedNot Met	finding F-003 · not POA&M-eligible · must be Met before close-out
AC.L2-3.1.1[a]	Not ratedMet	examine, test · EVD-NWA-0021

HandoffRevision 3 frozen · 110 of 110 rated · sha256 3b7e…91d0 · submitted for independent review by Priya Raman (Lead)

Staged example · synthetic data

AEGISFORGENorthwind Assurance

ReviewASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001 · r3Frozen

You are ReviewerML

ArrivedRevision 3 · frozen 6 Nov 18:30 · sha256 3b7e…91d0 · independent of the team

Aegis pre-check never answers for you

✓110 of 110 controls rated with method, rationale and artifact

✓6 Not Met · 6 findings · 6 POA&Ms with steps and a clock

Check2 rationales cite r2 evidence · confirm the r3 copy

PS.L2-3.9.1[a]	r2 citation	Checking…Concur · r3 copy matches · note added
IA.L2-3.5.3[a]	Not Met 6 Nov · re-examined after enrollment · Met 17:50	Concur

HandoffConcurred · 1 note resolved · sent to the authorizing official by Marcus Lindqvist · 7 Nov 09:31

Staged example · synthetic data

AEGISFORGENorthwind Assurance

PackageASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001 · r3Frozen

You are ApproverRK

ArrivedRevision 3 · reviewer concurred 7 Nov 09:31 · sha256 3b7e…91d0

104

score of 110 · minimum 88

104

Met

6

Not Met · all 1-point · POA&M-eligible

0

reviewer flags open

Return to LeadApprove · Conditional Level 2

ApprovedConditional Level 2 recommended · Rina Kaur · 7 Nov 16:40 · POA&M close-out within 180 days

Nov 7 17:05Released to client: assessment report, findings, POA&M

Nov 7 16:40Rina Kaur approved · Conditional Level 2 recommended

Nov 7 09:31Marcus Lindqvist concurred · 1 note

Nov 6 18:30Priya Raman froze revision 3 · 3b7e…91d0

Nov 6 17:50Dana Whitfield re-examined IA.L2-3.5.3[a] after MFA enrollment completed · Met

Staged example · synthetic data

Client · scope, upload, respond

1 of 4

The Front Door: the conversation is the workspace

The Front Door is where an assessor works with Aegis. Ask for a control and its objectives, ratings and evidence come into the conversation. Open a file and the value that matters is marked. Where the evidence and the requirement disagree, Aegis shows the two side by side and proposes a result. Then do the same across a whole family: Aegis reads every unrated objective, you save the safe proposals in one press, and the adverse ones stay yours, one at a time.

Demonstration with fictional data at a simulated pace. It shows how the Front Door is designed to work; some of what it shows is not in the product yet.

AEGISFORGENorthwind Assurance Assessment in contextASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001 · Harbor Point CUI EnclaveActive You are Assessor Search or jump to…/ DW

Good morning, Dana

Assessor on ASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001 · Harbor Point CUI Enclave

118 objectives not rated, 7 Not Met, 3 requests without files. As of 09:41.

Open AC.L2-3.1.10 with its objectives and evidenceAsked on Today

AC.L2-3.1.10 has 3 objectives: 1 Met, 2 not rated. 2 files are linked. As of 09:41.

AC.L2-3.1.10 SESSION LOCK ·AC Access Control This controlIncomplete1 of 3 rated · Points: 1

Use session lock with pattern-hiding displays to prevent access and viewing of data after a period of inactivity.

Objective	Result	Rationale	Evidence
AC.L2-3.1.10[a] · the period of inactivity after which the system initiates a session lock is defined;	`1`Met	Examined the access control policy v6; §4.3 sets the period at 15 minutes.	PDF 1
AC.L2-3.1.10[b] · access to the system and viewing of data is prevented by initiating a session lock after the defined period of inactivity; and	`0`Not Assessed	Add rationale	XLSX 1 PDF 1
AC.L2-3.1.10[c] · previously visible information is concealed via a pattern-hiding display after the defined period of inactivity.	`0`Not Assessed	Add rationale	None · a gap, not a result

Evidence for this controlXLSXworkstation-security-settings.xlsxEVD-NWA-0031PDFaccess-control-policy-v6.pdfEVD-NWA-0030

Show the settings export for [b]Asked on Today

Opened beside objective [b]. One value does not match the period your client defined: cell B5.

XLSXworkstation-security-settings.xlsxEVD-NWA-0031Close

SHA-2568c21e4d07b3f…a94fa0Copy checksum

Records · 6 rows6 rows × 2 columns · sheet SettingsCited by Aegis · Settings!B5

Settings
Row	A	B
1	Setting	Configured value
2	Account lockout threshold	5 attempts
3	Account lockout duration	15 minutes
4	Minimum password length	14 characters
5	Interactive logon: Machine inactivity limit	3600 seconds
6	Password protect the screen saver	Enabled

AC.L2-3.1.10[b] Not Assessed Aegis proposes Not Met Draft Saved Nobody has saved a result yet.Saved by DWDana Whitfield · 09:44

access to the system and viewing of data is prevented by initiating a session lock after the defined period of inactivity; and

Reading 1 file against this objective

What Aegis foundAcceptDismiss

Suggested rating:Not MetHigh confidence · 2 sources · 9 Nov 2026 · 09:42

Defined15 minaccess-control-policy-v6.pdf · §4.3

Configured60 minsettings export · B5 · 3600 seconds

45 minutes over the defined period

Requirement AC.L2-3.1.10[b] · a session lock after the defined period of inactivity.

Suggested rationale Examined the workstation settings export. The session lock engages after 3600 seconds (60 minutes); the access control policy defines 15 minutes (§4.3). The defined period is not implemented.

Advisory · You decide the rating and final wording.

Aegis draft accepted · edit anything before you rate

Methods usedExamine Interview Test

Rationale Required, 20 or more characters

Examined the workstation settings export (EVD-NWA-0031). The session lock engages after 3600 seconds (60 minutes); the access control policy defines 15 minutes (§4.3). The defined period is not implemented.

This objective

1Met2Not Met3N/A0Not Assessed

Now run Aegis on the rest of Access ControlAsked on Today

Run AegisFamily · AC Access Control · 22 requirementsWorkingFinished

It will read 65 objectives. It skips 5 already rated. It rates nothing and never changes a saved result.

0 of 65

What Aegis did Read 65 of 65 objectives. Proposed: 49 Met, 3 Not Met. 9 objectives have no files to read. 4 not read: no readable text. Advisory only: nothing is rated until you accept it.

AC Access Control Needs you 652118 Aegis proposals 5285 No evidence 9 Run AegisAccept safe proposals…

Objective	Result	Aegis	Evidence
AC.L2-3.1.1[a] · authorized users are identified;	`0`Not Assessed`1`Met	Proposes Met · High confidenceSaved by you 09:49 · Aegis’s text	XLSX 1
AC.L2-3.1.1[d] · system access is limited to authorized users;	`0`Not Assessed`1`Met	Proposes Met · High confidenceSaved by you 09:49 · Aegis’s text	XLSX 1 PDF 1
AC.L2-3.1.5[b] · access to privileged accounts is authorized in accordance with the principle of least privilege;	`0`Not Assessed	Proposes Met · Moderate confidence	PDF 1
AC.L2-3.1.8[b] · the defined means of limiting unsuccessful logon attempts is implemented.	`0`Not Assessed`1`Met	Proposes Met · High confidenceSaved by you 09:49 · Aegis’s text	XLSX 1
AC.L2-3.1.9[b] · privacy and security notices are displayed.	`0`Not Assessed`2`Not Met	Proposes Not Met · High confidenceReviewed and saved by you 09:53	PNG 2
AC.L2-3.1.11[b] · a user session is automatically terminated after any of the defined conditions occur.	`0`Not Assessed`2`Not Met	Proposes Not Met · High confidenceReviewed and saved by you 09:58	PDF 1
AC.L2-3.1.12[d] · remote access sessions are monitored.	`0`Not Assessed`2`Not Met	Proposes Not Met · High confidenceReviewed and saved by you 10:04	PDF 1
AC.L2-3.1.10[c] · previously visible information is concealed via a pattern-hiding display after the defined period of inactivity.	`0`Not Assessed	No proposal · no files to read	None

8 of 65 shown · 57 more objectives in this family

Accept and save 44?

44 High-confidence proposals on rows nobody has saved. Left for you: 3 with an adverse result; 5 below High confidence. Each is saved as your determination, marked as Aegis’s text.

Accept and save 44Cancel

44 saved as your determinations · Dana Whitfield · 09:49 · each marked as Aegis’s text

A accept X dismiss ⌘↵ save and nextAdverse results are yours, one at a time.

18 still need you: 5 below High confidence, 13 without a proposal.

Draft POA&M items for today’s Not Met resultsAsked on Today

4 Not Met results today. 3 are POA&M-eligible at 1 point each. AC.L2-3.1.12 is a 5-point requirement, so it gets no draft: it has to be Met before close-out.

POA&M items 3 drafts, not saved3 created Set for all 3 Choose an ownerElena Brooks · Harbor Point Set a date9 Dec 2026

Requirement	Weakness	Plan	Owner	Planned completion
AC.L2-3.1.101 point · eligiblePOAM-HPPM-0007 · Open	Workstations lock after 60 minutes of inactivity; the policy defines 15 (§4.3).	Set the machine inactivity limit to 900 seconds; export the settings again.	—Elena Brooks	—9 Dec 2026
AC.L2-3.1.91 point · eligiblePOAM-HPPM-0008 · Open	The logon notice is missing on 2 of 14 servers.	Apply the notice policy to both servers; capture their logon screens.	—Elena Brooks	—9 Dec 2026
AC.L2-3.1.111 point · eligiblePOAM-HPPM-0009 · Open	VPN sessions have no idle timeout; the policy defines 30 minutes (§4.5).	Set the VPN idle timeout to 30 minutes; export the configuration.	—Elena Brooks	—9 Dec 2026
AC.L2-3.1.125 points	Not POA&M-eligible. No draft: it has to be Met before close-out.

Create 3 POA&M itemsDismissWeakness and plan drafted by Aegis. Nothing is created until you create it.

Created by DWDana Whitfield · 9 Nov 2026 · 10:09Weakness and plan drafted by Aegis

Today in Access Control: 48 objectives rated under your name (44 Met, 4 Not Met) and 3 POA&M items created. 18 objectives still need you.

Ahead 2 days·Evidence due Thu 19 Nov·Next: 18 objectives in Access Control

Ask AegisOpen AC.L2-3.1.10 with its objectives and evidenceShow the settings export for [b]Now run Aegis on the rest of Access ControlDraft POA&M items for today’s Not Met resultsNext: 18 objectives in Access Control (Tab)

How much is left to rate?How many objectives are Not Met?Open AC.L2-3.1.10

Aegis suggests; you decide. Check its sources.

Demonstration · fictional data

The assessor types what they need: a control, with its objectives and evidence.

One control, in depth. Ask for a control and its objectives, results and evidence arrive in the conversation. The file opens beside the objective with the value Aegis cites marked, and what was defined sits beside what is configured.

Then the whole family. Run Aegis reads every unrated objective against its mapped evidence and proposes. It rates nothing, skips what a person already rated, and offers no proposal where there is no evidence to read.

Safe in bulk, careful where it counts. Accept safe proposals saves only High-confidence proposals with no adverse result, on rows nobody has saved, in one press, under your name. Adverse and less certain proposals are left for you, counted by reason.

POA&M items, together. Aegis drafts one per eligible requirement and says which are not eligible. You set the owner and the date and create them; the record shows who and when.

Pathfinder: scope it, then collect it

The two slowest parts of any assessment are defining the boundary and answering evidence requests. Pathfinder is Aegis's scoping and collection capability. Vector proposes the scope from an interview and your documents; Beacon turns the confirmed scope into collection tasks. You keep, reject, capture or skip.

AEGISFORGEHarbor Point Property Management

SystemProperty Management CloudScope draft v1

You are ClientEB

Scope · VectorCollect · Beacon

Vector interview

Which systems store or process FCI for the DoD contract?

You: The PMC application servers, the finance file share, and the backups our MSP runs.

Do any contractors or providers reach those systems?

You: Harbor Cloud Services manages backups and the firewall.

Boundary · drawn as you answer

Proposed scope · each with its source

PMC-APP-01/02Application servers · in scopeanswer + asset export rows 14–15Kept

FS-FIN-02Finance file share · in scopeanswer · rule R-03Kept

HCS-BACKUPMSP backup service · inheritedCRM import §4 · provider evidence refKept

WIFI-GUESTGuest Wi-Fi · out of scoperule R-07 · no path to FCIKept

BLDG2-PRINTBuilding 2 printers · unknownasset export row 31 · no answer yetAsk IT

Scope v1 confirmed14 items · 1 unknown · sha256 7c1d…e9a2bound to ASSESS-HPPM-2026-0001

Beacon collection tasks from the confirmed scope

11 tasks across 9 objectives. Each says what to capture and where. You press Capture or Skip.

AC.L2-3.1.1PMC-APP-01 · local administrators group membership · screenshot or exportcaptured 10:42 · named · routed · EVD-NWA-0012Captured

IA.L2-3.5.3PMC-APP-01 · MFA policy for privileged accounts · policy exportwaiting for your pressCapture

SC.L2-3.13.1Boundary diagram · inherited from Harbor Cloud Servicesprovider evidence reference · CRM §4Skip · inherited

Ready to send · 1 of 11Aegis checks each capture against its objective after you send.

Staged example · synthetic data

Scope, with Vector. A guided interview and the documents you already have (an SSP, an asset export, a vulnerability scan, your provider's responsibility matrix) become a proposed boundary. Every item carries its source and the rule that placed it. A person with full permission keeps or rejects each one.

Frozen and bound. The confirmed scope is hashed and bound to the assessment that uses it. A later change opens a new version with a "what changed since v1" diff; a significant change reopens only what moved.

Collect, with Beacon. From the confirmed scope, Beacon lays out what each control's request needs, item by item, with capture help. Signed in as an administrator of your own environment, you press Capture or Skip. What you capture is named, routed and given an evidence ID before you send.

Facts once, every framework. CMMC Level 2 first, HIPAA next. Cloud and managed-service inheritance is first class: inherited, shared or yours, with the provider's evidence reference.

Aegis works for the assessor. You make the call.

Aegis is the assessor's companion inside AegisForge. It reads the evidence on your assessment, finds the passage, drafts the finding and proposes the rating, inside your permissions. The parts below show what the platform does; the band after them shows how the agent is kept inside the lines.

Aegis proposes. You decide with one press. The record shows both.

In the product today · six parts, each shown working

Your SharePoint

Screening Procedure v3.2

MFA enrollment report

Boundary diagram r4

Read only · nothing copied

read · hash · version

AegisForge · the record

EV-0042

MFA enrollment report

SHA-256 3f2a…9c · v7

read where it lives · 16:04:12

Your evidence stays where you keep it

Link a SharePoint folder, read only. AegisForge reads a file where it lives and records its fingerprint and version each time. Nothing is copied unless you send it.

Or send files in, or record a file by its hash alone. Whichever home you choose, Aegis works from the passages it needs and the counts, never the files, and marked content is refused at the door.

evidence-q4.zip · 37 files

Drop evidence here

access-review.xlsx	→ REQ-021 · AC.L2-3.1.1	proposed
mfa-policy.pdf	→ REQ-018 · IA.L2-3.5.3	proposed
baseline-v1.3.docx	→ REQ-024 · CM.L2-3.4.1	proposed
log-retention.png	→ REQ-030 · AU.L2-3.3.1	proposed

Review 37 matches · Submit37 screened · fingerprinted

Drop a ZIP, review the matches, submit

Upload supported files in a ZIP or select them together. Review the proposed matches to open evidence requests, change any match, then submit.

Every file is screened and fingerprinted on arrival: PDF, Word, PowerPoint, Excel, images, text, CSV, JSON, XML, email and HTML. A match is a proposal until you submit it, and the record keeps each file's name, size, hash and arrival time.

Assessment setup · framework

CMMC L2800-53 Rev. 5FedRAMP Rev. 5

110controls320objectivesCMMC Level 2 · NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2

287controlsModerate baseline · NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 · Low, Moderate, High

323controlsModerate baseline · FedRAMP Rev. 5 · Low, Moderate, High

published catalog · version and baseline pinned

Pick the framework at setup

CMMC Level 2 / NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, and FedRAMP Rev. 5 Low, Moderate and High, chosen when the assessment is created.

When an assessment is created from a published catalog, its selected catalog version and baseline are pinned to that assessment, so every role rates the same version of the same controls.
Reports in your organization's name

Draft and export SSP content, assessment reports and POA&M records from the assessment workflow. Supported report PDF and Word exports use configured organization branding and defined report outlines.

People review and accept drafted content before release. The export is built from the record, so the figures in it are the figures on the record at the time it was generated.

Aegis+

POA&Ms tracked to close-out

Each weakness gets a plan, an owner, a date and the evidence that closes it. Aegis watches the recorded dates and flags what is due. Closing is your press.

Milestones, risk and the remediation evidence live on the item, between assessments as well. Reminders come only from recorded dates, never estimates, and the close-out is recorded with who and when.

Scan exports in, findings you confirm

Import supported Nessus or Tenable scan exports, review the results and confirm candidate findings.

The import is previewed before anything is created, and a confirmed finding carries the scan as its source. Every number on the dashboard is computed from the records, with the time it was read.

Hover, tap or focus a card for the detail. Every frame is a staged example with synthetic data.

How we run the AI

The decision is yours. Every time.

Aegis reads, finds, drafts and proposes. It cannot rate, accept, approve, submit or send. Each of those is a press by a named person, and the record keeps the press, the proposal it answered and the evidence both pointed to.

AegisForge is built to protect the client's record and to keep the agent inside the lines. The frame beside this is one rating, as the back end sees it.

Aegis

Proposed Met for PS.L2-3.9.1[a]

source EVD-NWA-0006 p. 4 · SHA-256 3f2a…9c · methods examine, interview